Why We Should Not Fight The Mexicans Essays -

Why We Should Not Fight The Mexicans War with Mexico will destroy us yet. Fighting with them will set a burden on us as well as on them. We are fighting with them for the say reason; England was fighting with us. England fought us because we would not follow the laws that they passed, and we want to fight the Mexicans because they dont want to give us the land that we want. In some way you could call this being hypocritical. Annexing Texas was the dumbest mistake we ever made; it will upset our balance of beliefs. Even though Mexico is our adversary, so was England, what if one day we want to trade with Mexico. Do you think that they would want to trade with us? No, we will become the country that pushed them down when they were already weak enough as it is, and the War will terminate ever having Mexico as an ally/ If we fight Mexico then we are being hypocrites, of what we fought for when we went against England. We are treating them as if they belong to us; they are there own country. We are forcing them to give us something that is rightfully theirs. Mexico is a weak country and we are a strong country. For example, in the Revolutionary War the odds were against us, the British were strong and we were weak. They came into our territory thinking they could push us over, but it turned out just the opposite. The same thing could happen here, they outnumber us by far, but yet we are better skilled and trained. But they have the same chance of winning as we do. If we win, what will become of us? Will we turn into a greedy anarchy just as England, acting as a authoritarian that will make War with anyone who steps in our way. We are a very strong country we dont need more land, we are barely using up the land we have now. Instead of conquering we need to focus on the things that we need most, like working on giving our less fortunate children a better education, and fix up the working conditions. The annexation of Texas is the dumbest decision congress has ever made. Sooner or later the issue over whether it should be a free state or slave with come up. We have a balance of thirteen free states and thirteen slave, and adding Texas in there will upset the balance. Henry Clay said in his letter to the Editors of the National Intelligence that Annexation would be to proclaim to the world an insatiable and unquenchable thirst for foreign conquest or acquisition of territory. For if today Texas be acquired to strengthen one part of the confederacy, tomorrow Canada may be required to add strength to another. Finally, the part of the confederacy which is now weakest, would find itself still weaker from the impossibility of securing new territory for those peculiar institutions (slavery) which it is charged with being desirous to extend.... Which means that Texas could cause controversy within the US. As of now slavery cannot be mentioned in Congress without men arguing, and starting a fight. War will kill any future trade with Mexico. One day we are going to want something the Mexicans have. Such as fruit, gold, or other raw materials, that we may want. Most likely they will not want to give it to us. Are we going to fight with them over that? They have every right to not trade with us. We show up in their country bullying them around. In the end, we might go to war, we will force them to sell their land that they acquired form their own revolution. Not only will it cause internal trouble for use. It will weaken our already weak relationship between Mexico and us. History Essays

Scream essays

Scream essays Edvard Munchs The Scream was painted in the end of the 19th century, and is possibly the first Expressionist painting. The Scream was very different from the art of the time, when many artists tried to depict objective reality. Munch was a tortured soul, and it certainly showed in this painting. Most of his family had died, and he was often plagued by sickness. The Scream was not a reflection of what was going on at the time, but rather, Munchs own inner hell. It visualizes a desperate aspect of fin-de-sicle: anxiety and apocalypse. The persuasiveness of the motif shows that it also speaks to our day and age (Whaley 75 ). When Edvard Munch was asked what had inspired him to do this painting, he replied, One evening I was walking along a path, the city on one side of me and the fjord below. I felt tired and ill. I stopped and looked out across the fjord. The sun was setting, the clouds were turning blood red. I felt a scream passing through nature. It seemed to me that I could hear The Scream. I painted this picture; painted the clouds as real blood. The colors screamed (Preble 52). Some people, when they look at this painting, only see a person screaming. They see the pretty blend of colors, but dont actually realize what they are looking at. A lone emaciated figure halts on a bridge clutching his ears, his eyes and mouth open wide in a scream of anguish. Behind him a couple are walking together in the opposite direction. Barely discernible in the swirling motion of a red-blood sunset and deep blue-black fjord, are tiny boats at sea, and the suggestion of town buildings ( Preble 53). This painting was definitely the first of its kind, the first Expressionist painting. People say that a picture is worth a thousand words. If thats the case, then The Scream is worth a million. It has a message that no other painting of its time...

Policy development Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Policy development - Case Study Example The sports are girls filed hockey, boys’ football, boys and girls’ soccer, lacrosse, and archery. Every sport require a game time on the one outdoor field. It is impossible to drop any sport because all of them are important (Baird 2011, p. 78). It is also illegal and uncomfortable to use a field that is not within the school compound. Students are required to carry out all their activities within the school. There are several ways of handling the matter. The problem of land as a limited resource is a common problem in all institutions. Wisdom is applied to make use of what is available. The school has to participate in all the sports. Leaving out any one of them will amount to discriminating the group of students who play those games. The school’s principles work to eliminate any form of discrimination by promoting equity and fairness. There is an option of finding a field outside the school compound. The option has some limitations. There is an option of partitioning the field into small portions but this also has some limitations (Baird, 2011). The third option is to prepare a schedule of events on when every sport takes place. However, the third option is limited by the existence of a parallel school schedule which we have to give priority. All the options have limitations. A solution can be to find another field outside the premises of the school. Students will waste time going to a field located off the school property. Acquiring a field implies an additional cost. The process of accessing funding to undertake such a project is involving as it is difficult to get approval. The second option of partitioning the field is limited by the small land available. The school compound can only accommodate one outdoor field (Baird 2011, p. 96). The school has no option but to work with the small land available. Another option is to form a schedule by planning the time in which every sport takes place. There is a challenge of coming up